Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Evidence Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

4,575 Full-Text Articles 3,175 Authors 2,249,100 Downloads 141 Institutions

All Articles in Evidence

Faceted Search

4,575 full-text articles. Page 1 of 92.

Beyond The Witness: Bringing A Process Perspective, Edward K. Cheng, G. Alexander Nunn 2019 Univ. of Arkansas School of Law

Beyond The Witness: Bringing A Process Perspective, Edward K. Cheng, G. Alexander Nunn

Edward Cheng

For centuries, the foundation of the Anglo-American trial has been the witness.' Witnesses report on their personal observations, provide opinions of character, offer scientific explanations, and in the case of parties, narrate their own story. Indeed, even for documentary and other physical evidence, witnesses often provide the conduit through which such evidence reaches the factfinder. Documentary or physical evidence rarely stands on its own. The law of evidence has thus unsurprisingly focused on-or perhaps obsessed over-witnesses. The hearsay rule and the Confrontation Clause demand that declarants be available witnesses at trial so that they may be subject to cross-examination.' Expert ...


Reappraising The Legality Of Post-Trial Interviews, Fredric I. Lederer 2019 William & Mary Law School

Reappraising The Legality Of Post-Trial Interviews, Fredric I. Lederer

Fredric I. Lederer

No abstract provided.


Replacing The Exclusionary Rule With Administrative Rulemaking, Francis A. Gilligan, Fredric I. Lederer 2019 William & Mary Law School

Replacing The Exclusionary Rule With Administrative Rulemaking, Francis A. Gilligan, Fredric I. Lederer

Fredric I. Lederer

No abstract provided.


Rights Warnings In The Armed Services, Fredric I. Lederer 2019 William & Mary Law School

Rights Warnings In The Armed Services, Fredric I. Lederer

Fredric I. Lederer

No abstract provided.


The Law Of Confessions - The Voluntariness Doctrine, Fredric I. Lederer 2019 William & Mary Law School

The Law Of Confessions - The Voluntariness Doctrine, Fredric I. Lederer

Fredric I. Lederer

No abstract provided.


Making Rule 23 Ideal: Using A Multifactor Test To Evaluate The Admissibility Of Evidence At Class Certification, Cianan M. Lesley 2019 University of Michigan Law School

Making Rule 23 Ideal: Using A Multifactor Test To Evaluate The Admissibility Of Evidence At Class Certification, Cianan M. Lesley

Michigan Law Review

Circuit courts are split on whether and to what extent the Daubert standard should apply at class certification. Potential plaintiffs believe that application of Daubert would make it nearly impossible to obtain class certification. For potential defendants, the application of the standard is an important way to ensure that the certification process is fair. This Note examines the incentives underlying the push to apply the Daubert standard at class certification and the benefits and drawbacks associated with that proposal. It proposes a solution that balances the concerns of both plaintiffs and defendants by focusing on three factors: the obstacles to ...


Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review 2019 Seattle University School of Law

Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

No abstract provided.


Why Do We Admit Criminal Confessions Into Evidence?, David Crump 2019 Seattle University School of Law

Why Do We Admit Criminal Confessions Into Evidence?, David Crump

Seattle University Law Review

There is an enormous literature about the admissibility of criminal confessions. But almost all of it deals with issues related to self-incrimination or, to a lesser extent, with hearsay or accuracy concerns. As a result, the question whether we ever admit criminal confessions into evidence has not been the subject of much analysis. This gap is odd, since confessions are implicitly disfavored by a proportion of the literature and they often collide with exclusionary doctrines. Furthermore, the self-incrimination issue sometimes is resolved by balancing, and it would help if we knew what we were balancing. Therefore, one might ask: Why ...


The Supreme Court And The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: Has The Burger Court Retreated?, Paul Marcus 2019 William & Mary Law School

The Supreme Court And The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: Has The Burger Court Retreated?, Paul Marcus

Paul Marcus

No abstract provided.


The Exclusion Of Evidence In The United States, Paul Marcus 2019 William & Mary Law School

The Exclusion Of Evidence In The United States, Paul Marcus

Paul Marcus

No abstract provided.


Restrictions On Law Enforcement Investigation And Prosecution Of Crime, Paul Marcus 2019 William & Mary Law School

Restrictions On Law Enforcement Investigation And Prosecution Of Crime, Paul Marcus

Paul Marcus

No abstract provided.


It's Not Just About Miranda: Determining The Voluntariness Of Confessions In Criminal Prosecutions, Paul Marcus 2019 William & Mary Law School

It's Not Just About Miranda: Determining The Voluntariness Of Confessions In Criminal Prosecutions, Paul Marcus

Paul Marcus

No abstract provided.


Defending Miranda, Paul Marcus 2019 William & Mary Law School

Defending Miranda, Paul Marcus

Paul Marcus

No abstract provided.


Co-Conspirator Declarations: The Federal Rules Of Evidence And Other Recent Developments, From A Criminal Law Perspective, Paul Marcus 2019 William & Mary Law School

Co-Conspirator Declarations: The Federal Rules Of Evidence And Other Recent Developments, From A Criminal Law Perspective, Paul Marcus

Paul Marcus

Perhaps the most important advantage available to a prosecutor in a criminal conspiracy case is the exception to the hearsay rule for co-conspirator declarations. The exception is widely used and is often a significant part of the government presentation. In essence, it provides that otherwise inadmissible hearsay declarations of coconspirators are admissible at trial against the defendant so long as they were made during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy. The exception typically arises when an alleged co-conspirator declarant tells the witness (often an undercover police officer) all about the conspiracy, perhaps in the hope of attracting a ...


What Do Snowmobiles, Mercury Emissions, Greenhouse Gases, And Runoff Have In Common?: The Controversy Over "Junk Science", Linda A. Malone 2019 William & Mary Law School

What Do Snowmobiles, Mercury Emissions, Greenhouse Gases, And Runoff Have In Common?: The Controversy Over "Junk Science", Linda A. Malone

Linda A. Malone

No abstract provided.


Book Review Of Fact Finding Without Facts: The Uncertain Evidentiary Foundations Of International Criminal Convictions, Linda A. Malone 2019 William & Mary Law School

Book Review Of Fact Finding Without Facts: The Uncertain Evidentiary Foundations Of International Criminal Convictions, Linda A. Malone

Linda A. Malone

No abstract provided.


The Procurement And Presentation Of Evidence In Courts-Martial: Compulsory Process And Confrontation, Fredric I. Lederer, Francis A. Gilligan 2019 William & Mary Law School

The Procurement And Presentation Of Evidence In Courts-Martial: Compulsory Process And Confrontation, Fredric I. Lederer, Francis A. Gilligan

Fredric I. Lederer

Although pretrial litigation often seems to render trial on the merits something of an anti-climax, adversarial adjudication is of course the focus of the criminal justice system, military or civilian. Once trial on the merits has begun, trial and defense counsel naturally utilize the rules of evidence in the fashion most likely to make the most of the evidence available to them. Yet, as all lawyers are aware, the period since the enactment of the Uniform Code of Military Justice has brought sweeping changes not only in military criminal law, but also in the "constitutionalization" of the law of evidence ...


The Military Rules Of Evidence: Origins And Judicial Implementation, Fredric I. Lederer 2019 William & Mary Law School

The Military Rules Of Evidence: Origins And Judicial Implementation, Fredric I. Lederer

Fredric I. Lederer

No abstract provided.


Technology Comes To The Courtroom, And . . ., Fredric I. Lederer 2019 William & Mary Law School

Technology Comes To The Courtroom, And . . ., Fredric I. Lederer

Fredric I. Lederer

No abstract provided.


Resolving The Frye Dilemma: A Reliability Approach, Fredric I. Lederer 2019 William & Mary Law School

Resolving The Frye Dilemma: A Reliability Approach, Fredric I. Lederer

Fredric I. Lederer

No abstract provided.


Digital Commons powered by bepress