Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 7 of 7

Full-Text Articles in Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law

The End Of Indecency - The Second Circuit Invalidates The Fcc's Indecency Policy In Fox Televisions Stations, Inc. V. Fcc, John V. O'Grady Jan 2011

The End Of Indecency - The Second Circuit Invalidates The Fcc's Indecency Policy In Fox Televisions Stations, Inc. V. Fcc, John V. O'Grady

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Obscenity Prosecutions And The Bush Administration: The Inside Perspective Of The Adult Entertainment Industry & Defense Attorney Louis Sirkin, Robert D. Richards, Clay Calvert Jan 2007

Obscenity Prosecutions And The Bush Administration: The Inside Perspective Of The Adult Entertainment Industry & Defense Attorney Louis Sirkin, Robert D. Richards, Clay Calvert

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Stern Penalties: How The Federal Communications Commission And Congress Look To Crackdown On Indecent Broadcasting, Geoffrey Rosenblat Jan 2006

Stern Penalties: How The Federal Communications Commission And Congress Look To Crackdown On Indecent Broadcasting, Geoffrey Rosenblat

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal

No abstract provided.


National Endowment Of The Arts V. Finley: The Propriety Of Viewpoint In Arts Funding Still Unknown, Melissa S. Vignovic Jan 1999

National Endowment Of The Arts V. Finley: The Propriety Of Viewpoint In Arts Funding Still Unknown, Melissa S. Vignovic

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Viewpoint Discrimination In The Military Context: Defining The Difference Due To The Military Honor And Decency Act Of 1996 In General Media Communications, Inc. V. Cohen, Dirk Simpson Jan 1999

Viewpoint Discrimination In The Military Context: Defining The Difference Due To The Military Honor And Decency Act Of 1996 In General Media Communications, Inc. V. Cohen, Dirk Simpson

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Nea V. Finley: A Decision In Search Of A Rationale, Lackland H.,Jr. Bloom Jan 1999

Nea V. Finley: A Decision In Search Of A Rationale, Lackland H.,Jr. Bloom

Washington University Law Review

For the better part of a decade, debate has raged over whether Congress can constitutionally restrict, or at least influence, the ability of the National Endowment for the Arts (“NEA”) to award grants to artists and institutions for the creation or display of art work that a significant segment of the public would consider highly offensive. In the October 1997 Term, the Supreme Court, by an 8-1 margin in NEA v. Finley, upheld section 954(d), a 1991 congressional amendment to the NEA Act that requires the Chairperson of the NEA to ensure that, in establishing regulations and procedures for ...


Artistic Freedom V. Censorship: The Aftermath Of The Nea's New Funding Restrictions, Michael Wingfield Walker Jan 1993

Artistic Freedom V. Censorship: The Aftermath Of The Nea's New Funding Restrictions, Michael Wingfield Walker

Washington University Law Review

No abstract provided.